CIS Benchmarks are a set of security best practices designed to help developers protect mobile apps from vulnerabilities. These guidelines, developed by the Center for Internet Security (CIS), focus on areas like operating system configurations, network security, encryption, authentication, and patch management. By following them, developers can reduce risks, ensure compliance with regulations like HIPAA or FERPA, and safeguard user data.

Key Points:

  • Operating System Hardening: Limit app permissions and disable unnecessary services.
  • Network Security: Use TLS 1.2+, certificate pinning, and HTTPS for all API calls.
  • Data Encryption: Encrypt sensitive data with AES-256 and use secure storage options like iOS Keychain or Android Encrypted SharedPreferences.
  • Authentication: Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA), OAuth 2.0, and biometric options.
  • Update Management: Regularly patch vulnerabilities and monitor third-party libraries.

Why It Matters:

CIS Benchmarks help organizations avoid breaches, comply with industry standards, and maintain secure mobile apps. Developers should integrate these practices into every phase of app development - from pre-development to post-launch maintenance.

Tools and Resources:

  • CIS SecureSuite: Automates benchmark assessments.
  • CIS Workbench: Provides access to guidelines and community support.
  • Community Insights: Offers troubleshooting and best practices for mobile-specific challenges.

By adhering to these benchmarks, teams can strengthen app security and address common threats effectively.

How to Implement the CIS Benchmark for Better iOS Security

Key Security Areas in CIS Benchmarks for Mobile Apps

The CIS Benchmarks outline five crucial areas for mobile app security, offering developers a structured approach to building safer applications. These areas address vulnerabilities that frequently plague mobile apps, with projections indicating that over 60% of mobile app vulnerabilities in 2025 will stem from insecure data storage and weak network security practices. By focusing on these areas, developers can ensure compliance and safeguard their apps against common threats.

Operating System Hardening

A secure operating system is the backbone of mobile app security. For both iOS and Android, this involves applying strict configurations, such as disabling unnecessary services and limiting app permissions to what's absolutely required. Each platform has unique priorities: iOS developers should concentrate on app sandboxing and privacy controls, while Android development demands careful permission management and attention to developer settings.

For example, instead of requesting broad location access, apps should only ask for permissions like "while using app" and explain why they're needed. Regular audits are essential to keep configurations aligned with evolving operating systems. Once the OS is hardened, the next step is securing network communications to protect data in transit.

Securing Network Communications

Protecting data during transmission is critical. CIS Benchmarks recommend using TLS 1.2 or higher for all network communications and implementing certificate pinning to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks. Certificate pinning ensures apps only connect to trusted servers with valid certificates. Developers should also enforce HTTPS for all API calls and configure secure Wi-Fi settings to safeguard sensitive information. These measures lay the groundwork for robust data protection at rest.

Data Encryption and Storage

Data security extends to both storage and transmission. Encrypt sensitive data using AES-256 and take advantage of platform-specific secure storage options. For instance, iOS developers can utilize the Keychain for credentials and tokens, while Android developers have tools like Encrypted SharedPreferences. Avoid storing sensitive data in plain text or insecure locations. By encrypting data effectively, developers can create a secure foundation for authentication measures.

Authentication and Access Control

Strong authentication is essential to block unauthorized access. CIS Benchmarks advocate for multi-factor authentication (MFA) and role-based access controls. OAuth 2.0 is a reliable framework for token-based authentication, ensuring tokens are securely stored and invalidated after logout or expiration. Adding biometric options such as FaceID, TouchID, or Android biometrics enhances security while maintaining user convenience. These options should complement traditional methods, with fallback solutions available for users who cannot use biometrics. Regular updates help keep these systems secure and effective.

Update and Patch Management

Staying ahead of vulnerabilities requires timely updates. Developers should establish processes to quickly patch security issues in both the app and its dependencies. This includes monitoring third-party libraries for advisories, applying updates promptly, and notifying users about critical changes. Automated update systems and integration with mobile device management (MDM) solutions can streamline this process. Routine vulnerability scans, testing updates in staging environments, and maintaining rollback capabilities help ensure updates address issues without introducing new ones. Documenting these practices supports long-term security maintenance.

Below is a summary of these key security areas and their implementations:

Security Area Primary Focus Key Implementation
OS Hardening Configuration & Permissions Disable unnecessary services, restrict app permissions
Network Security Data in Transit TLS 1.2+, certificate pinning, HTTPS for all API calls
Data Encryption Data at Rest & Transit AES-256, platform secure storage (Keychain/Encrypted SharedPreferences)
Authentication Access Control MFA, OAuth 2.0, biometrics, role-based access
Updates & Patches Vulnerability Management Automated updates, dependency monitoring, MDM integration

Together, these five areas provide a strong defense against common attack methods targeting mobile apps, ensuring a secure foundation for ongoing development and maintenance.

Step-by-Step CIS Benchmarks Compliance Checklist

Following CIS Benchmarks is a structured way to safeguard your mobile apps from vulnerabilities. Research indicates that 78% of mobile app breaches could have been avoided by adhering to established security checklists. This step-by-step guide ensures a thorough approach to secure app development.

Pre-Development Phase

Start by downloading the most recent CIS Benchmarks from the official CIS website. This ensures you're up to date with the latest security standards and avoids critical vulnerabilities.

Develop a security requirements matrix that links each CIS control to your project’s specific needs. For Android apps, refer to the CIS Android Benchmark, while iOS developers should use the corresponding iOS guidelines. This mapping will help distinguish between mandatory and optional controls based on your app’s context.

Share the guidelines with your team and assign responsibilities for each control. Ensure these assignments are well-documented to avoid confusion later.

Conduct an initial risk assessment to identify vulnerabilities specific to your app. For instance, apps handling sensitive data - like those in healthcare - may require prioritizing certain controls to address high-risk areas. With this groundwork in place, you’re ready to incorporate these controls into the development process.

Development Phase

During development, implement CIS controls focusing on encryption, authentication, and permissions. Follow secure coding practices, such as validating inputs, managing errors correctly, and avoiding hard-coded credentials.

Limit app permissions to the minimum necessary and perform regular audits to ensure you’re not granting excessive access. For example, avoid requesting unrestricted location tracking unless absolutely required.

Use data encryption for sensitive information. iOS developers can rely on Keychain for secure credential storage, while Android developers should use the Android Keystore and Encrypted SharedPreferences.

Ensure all network communications are encrypted by enforcing HTTPS and using TLS 1.2 or higher. Add an extra layer of security with certificate pinning to restrict connections to verified servers.

Incorporate static analysis tools to monitor secure coding practices and schedule regular code reviews. These steps help maintain compliance with CIS controls throughout the development phase.

Testing and Quality Assurance

After development, validate your security measures through comprehensive testing. Use static analysis to catch code flaws and dynamic testing to simulate real-world attacks, exposing vulnerabilities that might otherwise go unnoticed.

Test your app across various devices and networks to confirm your controls work under different conditions. For example, check compatibility with multiple OS versions and network configurations.

Ensure encryption and authentication mechanisms are functioning as intended. Attempt unauthorized access to protected data to test the robustness of your security features, including biometric authentication fallbacks and token expiration handling.

Integrate security testing into your CI/CD pipeline for continuous validation. Automated tests can quickly flag regressions, ensuring compliance issues are caught before reaching production.

Deployment and Maintenance

Once your app is live, establish continuous monitoring systems to track security incidents and analyze logs. Automated alerts can help you spot potential threats before they escalate.

Set up a patch management process to address vulnerabilities in both your app and its dependencies. Regularly monitor third-party libraries for security updates, test patches in a staging environment, and document all changes for future audits.

Maintain detailed, version-controlled documentation of your security measures, configuration updates, and compliance activities. This not only supports audits but also simplifies onboarding for new team members.

Schedule regular vulnerability assessments to adapt to evolving threats. Assess both technical and operational controls to ensure your app remains secure as it grows and changes.

Here’s a summary of the key deliverables for each phase:

Phase Primary Deliverables Timeline
Pre-Development Security requirements matrix, risk assessment, team assignments 1-2 weeks
Development Secure code implementation, permission configuration, encryption setup Development cycle
Testing & QA Security test results, vulnerability reports, compliance validation 2-3 weeks before launch
Deployment & Maintenance Monitoring setup, documentation, patch management procedures Post-launch

Experienced teams often streamline this process by using established frameworks and automation tools. For example, teams like those at Zee Palm can identify compliance issues early and implement solutions that address multiple CIS controls simultaneously. This approach saves time while ensuring your app adheres to robust security standards. By following this checklist, you’ll align your app with CIS Benchmarks and create a secure foundation for your users.

sbb-itb-8abf120

Tools and Resources for CIS Benchmark Implementation

Implementing CIS Benchmarks for mobile apps involves using the right tools, leveraging community insights, and maintaining thorough documentation. The CIS ecosystem provides detailed guidelines for securing mobile operating systems and applications, ensuring each stage - from development to maintenance - aligns with best practices.

CIS SecureSuite and Workbench

CIS SecureSuite

CIS SecureSuite simplifies benchmark assessments by automating the process and offering tailored security recommendations for mobile platforms like Android and iOS. This automation reduces the manual workload needed to ensure compliance.

Meanwhile, CIS Workbench serves as a collaborative online platform. It allows developers to download CIS Benchmarks, access previous versions, and review configuration guides. The platform operates on a freemium model, offering basic benchmark access for non-commercial use, with advanced features available through paid memberships.

The CIS Controls v8 Mobile Companion Guide, released on 05/18/2021, provides a detailed framework for applying the 18 CIS Critical Security Controls to mobile environments. For each control, the guide includes an applicability assessment, deployment considerations for various mobile models, and discussions of relevant tools and threats.

In some cases, vulnerability scanners may need direct integration with Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) systems for device access, while others rely on agent-based solutions installed directly on mobile devices.

Community and Support Resources

Active engagement with the CIS Benchmarks Community offers invaluable support for implementing CIS Benchmarks. This community connects developers, cybersecurity experts, and implementers, facilitating discussions on troubleshooting, updates, and best practices. The collective expertise ensures guidelines are practical and reflect real-world challenges through a consensus-driven process.

The community also helps address mobile-specific issues, such as managing Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Corporate Owned, Personally Enabled (COPE) policies. It emphasizes that all work-related mobile devices must be managed through technical, procedural, or policy measures, as unmanaged devices are unsuitable for enterprise use.

Another key focus is mobile vulnerability management. Mobile devices often operate outside corporate networks, complicating traditional vulnerability assessments. In such cases, Mobile Threat Defense (MTD) tools are recommended as agent-based solutions, particularly for devices not fully integrated into corporate systems.

Documentation and Localization

Accurate and thorough documentation is critical for demonstrating compliance and streamlining audits. For U.S.-based teams, this means adhering to standard American conventions, such as MM/DD/YYYY date formats, the dollar sign ($) for currency, and imperial measurements where applicable.

Documentation should track all software assets, including mobile device firmware, operating system versions, and installed applications. Teams must also maintain detailed records of authorized and deployed versions. For administrative access, it’s essential to document Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) or Mobile Device Management (MDM) dashboard configurations and privilege assignments, as protecting administrative access in web applications is a priority.

Maintaining clear and detailed records supports compliance and simplifies regulatory reviews. Organizations should establish baseline security configurations and implement robust configuration management and change control processes for active reporting.

Documentation Area Key Requirements U.S. Format Standards
Configuration Records Baseline settings, change logs, and approval workflows MM/DD/YYYY dates; EST/PST time zones
Vulnerability Reports Assessment results and remediation timelines Date and currency formatting
Compliance Audits Control implementation status and evidence collection Business formatting conventions

Consistent documentation ensures that configuration changes, security updates, and compliance measures are well-documented. This not only aids regulatory compliance but also strengthens internal security governance.

Development teams, such as those at Zee Palm, often streamline documentation by using standardized templates and automated reporting tools. These practices help ensure that mobile app security aligns with CIS Benchmarks while meeting organizational audit requirements. With these tools and resources in place, the next section will explore common challenges that can hinder CIS Benchmark compliance.

Common Mistakes When Implementing CIS Benchmarks

Even with a wealth of tools and resources at their disposal, developers can still make errors when applying CIS Benchmarks to mobile apps. These missteps can create serious security vulnerabilities, undermining the entire compliance effort. By identifying these common mistakes, teams can build more secure applications and avoid costly fixes down the road. Recognizing these pitfalls can refine your approach to CIS Benchmark compliance in future development phases.

Overlooking Device-Specific Configurations

When implementing security controls, it's crucial to customize configurations for each platform. A common mistake is using the same settings for both Android and iOS, despite their vastly different security architectures. This one-size-fits-all approach can leave significant gaps in protection.

For example, iOS has unique requirements. Developers sometimes neglect to utilize Apple's Device Enrollment Program for managed devices or fail to configure App Transport Security (ATS) correctly. Given iOS’s controlled ecosystem, security measures should emphasize managed deployment and thorough app vetting processes.

On the Android side, issues often arise from outdated operating systems or enabling "unknown sources" for app installations - practices that directly violate CIS recommendations. Research shows that applying generic settings across platforms can lead to higher breach rates, with Android devices being particularly vulnerable to malware outbreaks due to these oversights.

To address this, teams should create separate checklists tailored to each platform and assign specialists who understand the unique security needs of Android and iOS.

Skipping Regular Audits

Mobile environments are constantly evolving with frequent OS updates, new app versions, and shifting threat landscapes. Yet, many organizations treat CIS Benchmark implementation as a one-and-done task instead of an ongoing process. This mindset can leave vulnerabilities unnoticed until a breach occurs.

Without regular audits, outdated apps or OS versions with known vulnerabilities may remain in use, exposing devices to attacks. Routine reviews are essential to ensure continued compliance with CIS standards, verify the effectiveness of security controls, and adapt to new threats. Audits also help identify configuration drift - when devices gradually deviate from a secure baseline due to updates or user changes. Vulnerability scans often reveal that devices missing basic CIS-recommended controls, like encryption or regular updates, are far more likely to be compromised.

Successful teams schedule audits consistently - monthly for high-risk environments and quarterly for standard deployments. They also conduct additional reviews after major OS updates, security incidents, or significant app changes.

Poor Documentation Practices

Accurate documentation is just as important as technical configurations and audits. Incomplete or poorly maintained records can undermine compliance efforts. Many developers fail to keep detailed logs of security configurations, and skipping version control or neglecting to document exceptions can complicate future audits.

For instance, disabling a security control to address a compatibility issue without documenting the reason can lead to confusion during later audits and potential non-compliance. Without clear records, tracking configuration changes becomes nearly impossible.

To avoid this, teams should maintain a centralized, searchable repository for security configurations, update logs, and audit trails. Each entry should reference specific CIS Controls and include implementation dates formatted as MM/DD/YYYY. This practice not only supports compliance but also simplifies troubleshooting.

Experienced organizations, like Zee Palm, often use standardized documentation templates and automated reporting tools to maintain consistency. Integrating record-keeping into daily workflows ensures accurate records and eliminates last-minute chaos during compliance reviews.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Recap of Key Points

Securing mobile apps with CIS Benchmarks means embedding security into every stage - from development to ongoing maintenance. The five core security areas create a solid base for safeguarding any mobile application.

By following the comprehensive checklist, your team can confidently implement these essential security measures across the development lifecycle. This approach has been shown to lower the risk of data breaches by up to 40% compared to organizations without standardized controls. The framework has proven its effectiveness in industries ranging from Fortune 500 companies to government agencies worldwide. However, the work doesn’t stop after deployment - continuous monitoring and regular updates are vital to maintaining security.

Tools like CIS SecureSuite and Workbench offer valuable support for configuration management and monitoring, ensuring your team stays aligned with evolving security requirements. With the rise of DevSecOps practices, integrating CIS Benchmarks into CI/CD pipelines has become increasingly common, allowing security checks to be automated throughout the development process.

This structured framework empowers teams to create more secure and streamlined app development workflows.

How Expert Teams Can Help

Expert teams can play a crucial role in overcoming compliance challenges and accelerating CIS Benchmark implementation. Their expertise is especially beneficial for organizations operating in highly regulated sectors like healthcare, finance, or education.

Take Zee Palm, for example - a team with over a decade of experience in AI, SaaS, healthcare, EdTech, and custom app development. They bring a deep understanding of the specific security challenges different industries face. With over 100 successful projects under their belt, they’ve honed strategies to avoid common pitfalls and deliver effective solutions. Their approach includes integrating CI/CD pipelines, adhering to clean code standards, leveraging AI-enhanced quality checks, and performing thorough static security assessments.

Expert teams also address the ongoing demands of CIS compliance. Many professional development teams offer robust support services, such as 24-hour critical bug resolution and routine security updates, ensuring compliance is maintained well beyond deployment.

"If the bug is from a feature that we delivered previously. We will resolve it for free while you are subscribed to us."

For organizations prioritizing mobile app security, collaborating with experienced teams can turn CIS Benchmark implementation into more than just a compliance task. It becomes a strategic advantage - building customer trust and minimizing long-term security risks.

FAQs

How do CIS Benchmarks enhance the security of mobile app development?

CIS Benchmarks offer a detailed framework of best practices designed to enhance the security of your mobile app development process. By adhering to these guidelines, developers can pinpoint and address potential vulnerabilities, align with industry standards, and create applications that prioritize user data protection and privacy.

Integrating CIS Benchmarks into your development workflow not only fortifies your app's security but also helps establish user trust and confidence in your product. If you're looking for expert guidance in secure app development, Zee Palm's team brings over ten years of experience crafting tailored solutions for industries such as healthcare, EdTech, and AI-driven platforms.

What challenges do developers face when applying CIS Benchmarks to Android and iOS apps?

Implementing CIS Benchmarks for Android and iOS apps isn’t always straightforward. Each platform comes with its own security settings and requirements, which can make aligning with benchmark standards tricky. Developers often face challenges like managing permissions in a way that complies with both platforms while also ensuring the app functions as intended. Conflicts between security benchmarks and app functionality can add another layer of complexity.

On top of that, staying current with frequent updates to CIS Benchmarks and platform-specific guidelines demands constant attention. Developers not only have to keep security airtight but also ensure the app delivers a smooth user experience - a task that becomes even more demanding for apps with complex features or multiple integrations. Balancing these priorities takes careful planning and effort.

Why are regular audits and thorough documentation essential for maintaining CIS Benchmark compliance in mobile apps?

Keeping your mobile app aligned with CIS Benchmarks requires two essential practices: regular audits and detailed documentation.

Audits play a key role in spotting potential security gaps and ensuring your app stays up-to-date with evolving compliance standards. By routinely assessing your app, you can address vulnerabilities before they become serious issues.

At the same time, maintaining detailed documentation acts as a roadmap of your compliance efforts. It not only helps track changes but also simplifies reviews by clearly showing how your app meets the required standards. Plus, it can make future updates more efficient. Together, these practices create a secure, dependable app environment and strengthen trust with both users and stakeholders.

Related Blog Posts